|
technology
budgets
The
Right
Technology Actually Costs You Nothing
While it is difficult to measure and quantify, most companies find
that the right technology can improve employee performance and save
labor costs far in excess of the cost of the technology; therefore the
right investments in technology should really cost you nothing compared
to the savings gained. You can prove this theory to a certain extent by
comparing the revenue per employee generated by the Fortune 500
companies before the computer craze (say 1980) to revenue per employee
generated today. Even after adjusting these amounts for inflation,
today’s employee generates from five to twenty times the revenue today
compared to 1980. People haven’t gotten smarter, they are just far more
efficient. Consider these examples:
In 1980, the process of producing a letter involved handwritten
drafts deposited in secretarial pools where eventually the letter would
be typed and routed back to the author. A series of handwritten edits
and revisions followed, including a typed envelope. This process could
take several days to complete, copies were then made and filed away,
sometimes in duplicate or triplicate. Later these files were archived or
shredded, a process that required more labor. Recording archived papers
and retrieving them could take up to a half hour. At the time Xerox
estimated that each page of paper produced by a corporation in 1980 cost
about $50 to produce, handle and store once all costs are considered.
Today, letters are prepared faster on computers. Built in tools check
spelling and grammar. E-mail systems send these letters immediately and
archive them as well. The cost of producing that same letter today is
estimated to be les than $3.00, and some estimates are far lower.
In the 1980’s manual time sheets and expense reports required
handwritten reports coupled with calculations. Other employees would
gather these reports and re-enter the data. Both procedures were prone
to human error. Today many employees enter their time and expenses into
web browsers via drop down boxes. Input time is dramatically reduced,
the need for hand calculations are eliminated, errors are far less
frequent, the need to re-enter data is eliminated, logical rules
automatically check for reasonability etc.
Also in the 1980’s, companies employed a labor intensive reordering
process which often included manual inventory counts, comparisons to
desired stock levels, preparation of purchase orders, mailing these
orders or manually phoning them in to the suppliers, the re-entering of
these orders, etc. This process was slow and subject to errors. By
contrast, today’s automated supply chains keep track of goods sold, and
automatically reorders those goods when optimum re-order points are
reached. As orders are produced, they are transferred to the suppliers
accounting system automatically for immediate processing. There is
virtually no labor involved. Built-in logical rules ensure that goods
are reordered at the optimum times, and at optimum quantities. These
just-in-time inventory systems have dramatically reduced the order to
shelf time from about 90 days (for JCPenny’s in 1980) to less than 3
days (for much of Wal-Mart’s goods today). Quicker orders allow
companies to carry lower levels, which in turn reduces the carrying
costs and interest on the floor plan note. More dramatically today’s
webbots can even perform reverse auctions on the fly during this supply
chain process to have suppliers competing to bid down the purchase price
of goods.
These examples (along with hundreds of others including direct
deposit, bar code scanners, cellular phones, financial reporting, the
internet, CRM tools, printers, faxes, e-mail, spreadsheets, and more)
offer proof that technology has dramatically reduced the expenses for
all business large and small over the past 25 years. The unprecedented
gains in the Dow Jones, S&P 500 and the NASDAQ can be directly
attributed to technology by catapulting profits which in turn catapulted
market capitalization (even though various political parties like to
claim credit for these results).
The Type of
Technology You Should be Paying for
Given the dramatic impact technology can have on a company, it is
folly to believe that one-time investments or investments in computers
alone are enough. In addition to computer hardware, technology
investments should also include software, training, peripherals, and
infrastructure. Computer hardware too needs to be replaced periodically
as well. Too often companies fail to invest in the entire technology
package. Inadequate training, slow printers, or the lack of a fast
internet connection can negate performance gains if not render your
technology virtually impotent. Consider the following examples which
illustrate this point:
If a microwave oven took 8 hours to bake a potato, you would likely
never use that microwave oven. Likewise, if your slow internet
connection takes 25 minutes to dial up, get connected, search, surf and
find what you are looking for, it is doubtful that you will use that
internet technology to its fullest.
Today’s HP 4100 printer can print 25 pages per minute at a cost of
just under 1 cent per page before paper costs. By contrast, the older HP
LaserJet 6 printers cost about 2.5 cents a page to print before paper
costs. This is because the HP 4100 printer applies toner far more
efficiently than does the HP LaserJet 6. Working the math, we see that
saving 1.5 cents per printed page over the course of 20 boxes of paper
saves $1500 (10,000 sheets times 10 cases times 1.5 cents per page =
$1500), which is about the cost of the new HP 4100 printer. Not only
will this new printer pay for itself, but your pages will print far
faster as well, saving employee wait time.
Training is important as well. Often employees are given nice
computers and software applications, but without proper training, they
are unable to capitalize on these investments. As a result they either
use their technology inefficiently or not at all. As a seasoned trainer,
I can attest to the fact that tens of thousands of attendees find that
attending 8 hour technology training courses on Excel, the Internet,
accounting systems, etc. are well worth the time and expense. They know
that they will recoup this time and financial investment within a year
just because they are better able to utilize their technology.
Rules of Thumb
There are many rules of thumb for technology investments, and a
sampling of these are listed below:
·
Companies should reinvest about one-third
of their technology costs each year for maintenance, replacement, and
training purposes. For example, in 2004 if your company spends $100,000
for hardware and software, you should expect to spend another $33,300
per year to maintain and upgrade those systems, and to train employees
in the use of those systems.
·
Companies should invest about 5% to 10% of
their revenue in technology, depending upon their particular industry
and based upon how technology savvy the company intends to be.
·
Each staff member in your organization
that needs one should have:
o
A relatively new computer;
o
Operating on a reliable LAN;
o
Equipped with the latest software
applications they need;
o
E-mail;
o
Access to a fast printer;
o
Virus protection;
o
Annual training
Some companies find that a technology budget of $2,000 per year per
employee is a good amount to budget for individual employee technology
purposes. The company’s core technology infrastructure including
servers, LANs, hubs cables, routers, wiring, phone systems, etc is
separate.
·
Computers should be replaced after 36
months. You should keep the same operating system installed on that
computer for it’s entire life – upgrading to a newer operating systems
which was not engineered and tested for that computer too often leads to
problems, crashes and blue screens of death.
Sample Technology
Budget
A sample 5 year technology budget for a smaller 15 person
organization with revenues of approximately $1.5 million is shown below.
This budget includes the cost of providing each of the 15 employees with
the following:
1.
A good current computer with plenty of
RAM and a flat panel monitor.
2.
A good server-based local area network,
including firewall.
3.
A good assortment of application software,
including Microsoft Office Professional, Adobe Acrobat, etc..
4.
Anti-virus and anti-spam software.
5.
Access to a high speed printer.
6.
Cellular phones for all.
7.
Peripherals such as PDAs, cradles,
cameras, and other gadgets.
8.
High speed internet access.
9.
E-Mail.
10.
Implementation.
11.
Training in the use of the various
equipment and software applications, including annual training.
12.
Insurance to cover and protect the
equipment.
Also included in this technology budget is the cost of a good
accounting system, including implementation and training.

This technology budget does not include the cost of supplies such as
printer paper or toner. Other technology costs that you might want to
consider adding to this budget include the following:
1.
PBX-based multi-line phone system.
2.
Copiers.
3.
Scanners.
4.
Color printers.
5.
Web site.
6.
Web site publishing tools (DreamWeaver,
Cold Fusion or FrontPage)
7.
E-Commerce web store.
8.
Document imaging solution.
9.
CRM tool.
10.
Remote access (via Citrix, Terminal
Server, or Go To My PC)
11.
Security system.
12.
Electronic supply chain.
Conclusion
Often technology doesn’t cost us anything, when the right
technologies are implemented correctly, the savings that result often
exceed the cost of technology. It is important to note that training is
an important aspect of making technology work best. It is also important
to recognize that keeping your technology current is also important.
Many businesses who think CHEAP actually are costing their companies a
great deal of money and quite possibly the future of the company.
Over the years I
have asked more than 100,000 people the following question: How many
people in this room have ever purchased a computer and later regretted
that purchase? With the exception of computers that just plain did not
work or did not arrive, no one has ever regretted purchasing a computer.
That’s a pretty good litmus test.
- END -
|